Things were different when I was a kid.
Not more innocent so much as more ignorant. We didn’t have your Google and your social media and stuff so we couldn’t look things up easily if we weren’t sure of things and there was no instant replay or catch-up so you always had to rely on the memory of witnesses and their ability to understand what on earth was going on. And we were crap at both of those.
When I was at school the most terrifying film ever made — even scarier than Dracula and Frankenstein and that bloke with the bandages…
Even scarier than them was this film that none of us had ever seen. It came on the telly once a year at silly o’clock at night when we were all in bed. Except for the ones that crept downstairs and found their mum and dad fast asleep in front of the telly. They got to see five or ten minutes’ worth before one or other woke up and told them to get back to bed. Only they didn’t know who anybody was, or what had happened and they weren’t so much watching the telly as watching their mum and dad for signs of waking up so that they had time to pretend to be sleepwalking so that they wouldn’t get told off. So they didn’t get to see much of the film and what they did see didn’t make any sense. But it was dead scary.
The next day at school we’d piece together the fragments and try to make sense of it all. As far as we could tell, it was set in a far-off land where everyone runs round the streets with burning sticks and shout a lot. And this bloke had been tortured to death and made to walk round the streets with his jumper over his head and all he was allowed to say was: “The bells! The bells!” And lots of people died and it was dead scary.
And we couldn’t have another look at the film to see if we were right because it wouldn’t be on for another year and we’d have forgotten the bits anyone had actually seen and could only remember the bits we’d made up to fill in all the gaps. We couldn’t go foraging on Youtube for it. We tried at the library: “Please miss, have you any books about horrible monsters in the films what wear their jumpers on their heads and kill people?” “There’s some new books about the Wombles over on that shelf over there.”
And then someone would come into school and say: “That film was on last night and I know what happens ‘cos I saw a bit near the end where everyone dies.” What happened? What happened? “That bloke what’s been tortured to death, they make him sit on the roof with his jumper over his head and he has a magic world what kills everyone and they’re all mangled and screaming and everything.”
And what was the magic word?
“Esmerelda!”
Esmerelda! How impressive was that? Some of the more twisted little boys tried the magic word on wasps but it didn’t work, even if they pulled their jumpers over their heads.
Imagine my disappointment when I finally got to see “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” for myself. I have great regard for Charles Laughton as an actor but there wasn’t so much as a tank top.
All these slasher movies, they’re proper gory and downright horrible but they don’t really do it for our generation because there’s no really terrifying knitwear in them. We’d been conditioned from an early age. “Your Auntie Maureen’s knitted you a new pullover for your birthday. Put it on, let’s see how you look in it. He’ll grow into it… Don’t slouch! Stand up straight or you’ll make it look all baggy and peculiar looking. Well, don’t make it any worse than it is. Has that arm always been that long?” In no particular order we were scared of Jack the Ripper, the nit nurse and the lady from the wool shop.
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
The horror!
Sunday, October 28, 2018
A bit of Danish
Round about the time we discovered that there was television after the Nine o'Clock News some bloody fool invented sex.
Up till then making babies
involved cough drops, strong ale and a couple of acres of winceyette nightwear.
Then suddenly they invented sex. One minute nothing was allowed, the next
minute some things were allowed but nobody knew which ones. Everyone was
confused. And we were just entering adolescence, which is too confusing for
words anyway, so we were baffled.
Findlay Anderson’s brother worked
in a sex shop and once a week he’d sneak something out of his brother’s stash
to bring to school. There’d be thirty of so lads clustered round behind the
cricket pavilion to have a look. (“Cricket pavilion!” — it was an old garden
shed with a slate blackboard nailed on the side. Not that that was any bloody
good because nobody could see it. They’d tell Darren Cladthorpe that he was the
scorer and he’d spend the entire match drawing pictures of willies and naked
ladies sitting in the bath eating the soap.)
Anyway… round the back of the pavilion… The teacher on playground duty
would say: “Are you boys smoking?” And we’d say: “No sir, we’re looking at
mucky books.” “That’s all right then. I won’t have you smoking behind the
cricket pavilion, you’ll be setting fire to the heavy roller.”
‘Course, it was
all wasted on us because we had no idea of the mechanics of the female form. It
was an all-boys school so we hadn’t really progressed beyond the scabs on
Audrey Mottershead’s knee back in Junior Class Four. Then we had a compulsory government
sex education film. We had to go to it one Tuesday night with our dads. We
hadn’t progressed beyond the scabs on Audrey Mottershead’s knee by the end of that,
either. We were told that the male member was called the penis and it was part
of the essential machinery of human reproduction; it was also useful because
you could use it to relieve yourself against a tree; now let’s have a look at
some of the more common venereal diseases. Half our class was convinced that if
you had a slash against a tree with a film crew present your goolies would go
blue and fall off. “I’m dying for a pee!” “There’s a tree over there.” “Can you
see any cameramen?” “No.” “Keep a watch out for us will you? I’m busting.”
That’s how ignorant we were. Thirty-odd of us clustered round a mucky book.
Three of them could actually see the pictures, the rest frantically trying to
find out what they can see. “What is it? What is it?” “It’s a nuddy lady.”
“What’s she doing?” “She’s got a baby hamster in her lap…" "Ahh… that's nice!" "…and she’s feeding it a
carrot.”
Saturday, October 27, 2018
Chrimbo
I’ve
got to that age where I’ve started looking back at childhood Christmases. It
wasn’t all tinsel and plenty. They seemed magical at the time but now I
can see that they were tinged with a sort of sadness. Like that time the kids
from down the road were looking through the window and laughing at the Action
Man that Father Christmas had bought me. Well, it was an Action Man to me, I
didn’t know any better. It was my sister’s cast-me down Cindy doll with its
hair cut short and a bit of boot polish smudged across the top of its nose. It
was in regimental dress uniform, though, so it was special. Some dress uniforms
include the kilts in the regimental tartan. This one included a pink PVC
mini-skirt. Well, I wasn’t to know, I mean, what do you know when you’re a
littlie?
David Purbright, he had a proper Action Man. With Eagle Eyes. There
was this little stick in the back of his head — the Action Man, not David
Purbright — and if you waggled it to the left his eyes shifted to the right;
waggle the stick to the right and the eyes shift to the left. And if you
waggled it to and fro the eyes shot from one side to the other until they got
stuck and he had to bash its head on the edge of the kerb to get them moving
again. Kids from five streets away would cluster round and watch as David
Purbright made Action Man’s eyes waggle to and fro. “Do it again, David!
Brilliant!”
iPads‽ Pfah!
Monday, October 01, 2018
Three wishes
A traveller chanced upon an oil lamp lying amongst some rocks in a deserted place. Laughing at his own folly, he brushed the dust off the lamp then gave it a vigorous rub with his shirt sleeve. There was a brief wisp of smoke, the smell of brimstone and cardamons and a sudden flash of purple light.
"I am the genie of the lamp," said the Djinn, "And I must grant you three wishes."
The traveller stared at the Djinn for some time. And as he stared he thought. And as he thought his eye caught the sharpness of the Djinn's sword. And as he thought the more his eye caught the coldness of the Djinn's eye. And as he thought the yet more his eye caught the cruel sardonic smile on the Djinn's lips.
"Tell me," said the traveller, "What is the usual punishment for men who try to be clever and wish for an infinite number of wishes?"
"Is that what you wish?" asked the Djinn.
"Certainly not!" replied the traveller. "I cannot imagine anything more foolish."
"Perhaps the punishment would be to grant the wish," said the Djinn slyly.
"I expect it would be," lied the traveller. "A wise man would not wish for such a thing. And even one as foolish as I would be wise enough not to do so."
"Why so?" asked the Djinn.
"Man is capable of the most terrible errors of judgement, even with the best of intentions," replied the traveller. "It is best that there is a limit to the mischief he may bring upon himself and the world."
"A man who understands the importance of boundaries is a wise man indeed," mused the Djinn. "Perhaps you would wish to impose a limit of time? All you could ever wish for a whole year, perhaps?"
The traveller smiled. "Oh no. I have too little faith in my own self-discipline or judgement to do that. Besides, I suspect that such a heady brew would be impossible to taste once and then willingly walk away. No, I shall do no such thing, I shall know my limits."
"You cannot be persuaded?" asked the Djinn.
"I cannot be persuaded," said the traveller.
"You still have your three wishes," said the Djinn.
"I still have my three wishes," said the traveller.